Museum Essays

by navpreet
(jagraon,ludhiana)

It is said by some people that museums an meant for entertainment. On the other hand, some people say that they are only meant for education.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In modern era, Museum approach as a prominent aspect of education and entertainment. It contributes to the attraction of country and beneficial for the enhancement of educational knowledge. There is a tendency to believe that museums must be utilized for entertainment as well as for education. Lets delve deeper into the topic to seek more clarification.

To begin with, One of the main arguments in favor of that museums are meant for entertainment because museums are tourists attraction and their aim to exhibit the collection of things which majority of people wish to see. It is favorable to enhance economical growth of a particular country and raise the standard of living due to numerous visitors from various countries. It sounds as adventurous activity and more enjoyable for visitors.Moreover,visitors can get information about history and biography of country.

On the other hand, Some people argued that museums should focus on education because its a huge source of knowledge which they did not previously know.Usually this means history behind the museum exhibits need to explained and this can be done in various ways. Some museums employ special guides to give information, while
other museums offer headsets so that people can listen to detailed commentary about the exhibition. In this way, museums play an important role in teaching people about history,culture, science and many other aspects of life.

In an ultimate analysis, the above argument would indicate that museum must be utilize for both purposes entertainment and education. These both aspects beneficial in different ways. However,a good museum should be able to offer an interesting, enjoyable and educational experience. So that people have fun and learn something at the same time.

Charging for Museums

by eunsi

Some museums charge for admission while others are free.

To what extent do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission outweigh its disadvantages?

Museums in the world run by a variety of purposes and budgets. In the past while the majority of museums were managed by governments and national authorities, various theme museums by private owners appeared these days. In this way, each museum has their own policies and strategy regarding entrance fee to attract audiences according to their economical situations.

In terms of museums that require customers at no cost to enter, there would be a number of pros and cons. Most of museums to educate citizens allow people to pay small amounts of money, since governments subsidize some portion of total budget. Also private museums tend to bigger amounts of entrance fee than national museums. These entry fees are likely use for maintenance, conservation and holding a new exhibition to maintain and improve museums. However, some people may feel burden to visit historical places and be reluctant to go often there due to economic problems.

By contrast, museums that levy at no cost enable individuals to visit more frequently. In London, for instance, where a number of museums such as Nature History Museums and V&A Museums allow locals and tourists to enter for free so that the places are mobbed with people all year round. Enormous people can have access to mater pieces and precious treasures whenever they want. However, it means that the government ought to allocate their national budget more on support arts and culture, resulting in less developed other social service sectors such as education and health care. Also visitors may ruin displays an objects easily, since they are less likely to have any obligation to conserve them.

From my perspectives both polices have advantages and demerits. However, if museums ask people to pay just small amounts of money like 1 dollars, audiences may look into the displays more and try not to damage historical objects and places thoughtfully than pay nothing.

***
You can make comments on this student's essay on charging for museums below.

Computer Images Replacing Museums and Galleries

by Tam
(Vietnam)

Hi IELTS buddies,
Please help me review my essay. Thank you very much.

Public museums and art galleries are not needed because people can see historical objects and artistic works by using computers.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The best advantage of social network apparently is infinite possibility in gathering information, such as knowledge of art or worthy objects. Hence, due to computers' applications, whether the investments in public museums and art galleries are necessary or not is a controversial issue. In my view, I disagree with the opinion that those investments are not needed and state strongly that perceiving a mental value is not simple by visual method on computer.

Firstly, not only is a worthy exhibit valued by its physical appearance but also is shown by the elegance of materials. Regardless of monitors' advanced resolution, users can never perceive entirely how far the damages of time to objects' surface make their historical values or how much devotion was put into every single inch of artists' works. As the result, the real approach indeed plays an important role in feel all the quintessence of the righteous value.

Furthermore, the conundrum that exhibits were frequently copied by illegal ways has affected strongly to individuals. For example, because of great reputation, the work "Mona Lisa" by Leonardo da Vinci had multifarious copies without any control. Thus, should people not gone to the right gallery, unfortunately, they could spot a mistake copy on social network.

This is not to say that using computers cannot bring the full approach. People can filter information from different resources on the internet so that gain the true knowledge of exhibits. But, this method does not bring success in all cases.

In sum, a worthy object should be perceived by deliberate way in the real context. And public museums or art galleries are necessary regardless of convenience of using computers. (275 words)

Charging for Museums Essay

by An Tran
(HCM City)

Many museums charge for admission while others are free.

Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

Lots of museums charge a fee while some do not. In my point of view, admission fee offers more benefits than providing at no charge.

On the one hand, it is beneficial for people to attend to free charge museums. Initially, museums house exhibitions and artifacts of great educational and historical value. Thus, admission free to the public and visitors which is likely to attract more attention would help to introduce the local community’s history and cultures. Otherwise, paying nothing for entrance fee is about to help wide range of people, particularly some poverty in the local area, approaching to the beauty, art and perhaps their ancestors’ accomplishments. More people come to museums might gain the public understanding about historical value and moreover, it could be valuable for their education.

On the other hand, charging for entrance fee seems to be better in some aspects. In terms of regulation, charging fee would help to ensure the security for attendants. For example, museums’ chiefs are going to have more budget to hire more security guards who would keep the safety for some invaluable artifacts or visitors. Furthermore, in case of preserve, some masterpieces, especially drawings demand very harsh conditions to sustain so that the more money affords the more modern appliances to preserve them. And last but not least, paying for entrance would support museums with some artifacts which were lost because of wars or thief. Otherwise, the financial support from charging would reduce economical burden in bringing back historic relics which would be saved and developed.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the advantages of charging for museums makes paying for entry the better choice, in spite of some benefits of paying nothing.

***

Please comment on this museum essay to help the student improve their score.

Charging for Museums and Art Galleries

by Martin
(Philippines)

Hello. Thank you for this forum. I will have my ielts exam next week and I'd really appreciate if you guys would comment on the essay that I made below. I am aiming for a band score 7. Thank you so much.

***
Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry.

Do you think the advantages of free admission outweigh the disadvantages?

There are may museums and centers which showcase different forms of art without any entrance fees. While some require admission charges, I believe that there are far more benefits with museums requiring no payment than those who charge.

To start with, it is a major downside for the people who are into visiting museums and art galleries if there is a charge involved. Not only that it would require them to get an amount out of their own pockets, but it would also affect their budget. Secondly, on the part of museum owners, charging no fees could mean that they would have to find alternative ways for maintenance expenditures and budget for the improvement of their facilities.

On the other hand, museums which offer free admission are advantageous to people who are into arts and crafts. Being admitted freely to seeing artworks and a gallery full of information of your interest really has its own perks. Moreover, it is highly beneficial to people who appreciate art and who are budget-conscious individuals as well. Lastly, history, knowledge, and information present in these museums are conveyed freely so it benefits not only the people but also the whole society in general.

In addition, more people could also be enticed to visit art centers if they do not charge admission fees. Despite not charging, if more people visit these art galleries, good publicity is carried from one person to another. Also, if publicity reaches out to more people, benefactors and donors are also within reach. Similarly, benefits are likely to cover both the community and the museum owners.

In conclusion, I believe that the advantages of free-admitting museums are far more than its disadvantages. Despite the potential budget problems of not charging fees that museums could suffer from, public curiosity and knowledge could still bring more benefits in the long run.

site search by freefind	advanced

• Writing
• Reading
• Speaking
• Listening

• All Lessons
• Vocabulary
• Quizzes
  
• Videos
• Forum
• Band Score Calculator
• Writing Feedback
• Speaking Feedback
• Teacher Resources
• Free Downloads
• Recent Essay Exam Questions
• Books for IELTS Prep
• Useful Links