Death of Languages Essay

by Tam
(Saigon, Vietnam)

Hi,

I am about to take the test in 1 month and I really need an objective perspective on my essays.

Please assist in reviewing mine.

Thank you

Every year, several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Due to the globalization trend, the relentless changes of society have resulted in the loss of several languages yearly. From an objective perspective, I disagree with the opinion that this issue is not important because if there are fewer languages, the life would be easier.

Firstly, only when there has been the penetration of foreign culture has the mother tongue lost its attention by youngsters. As the result, the generation gap between members in family has been extended and it has become the serious malady that should be turned the deliberated eyes. For example, because of the national application of English, the particular language of Singapore has just been used by elders. Therefore, the declining tendency of relationship between members in family has been increasing day by day and eventually, this conundrum has decreasing the value of family connection and it could lead the loneliness of older generation as the result.

Nonetheless, the loss of traditions is definitely the serious consequence that is worth being considered. In details, the mother tongue is one of the traditional heritages in order to recognize a country or a community and if it has lost, it could lead the disappear of other accumulated values, such as the music, poem or other manual things of culture. It can be involved the loss of culture in some ethnic minorities in Vietnam, being affected by national language, the particular language of Cham, Hmong, Giao, etc have not been used by youngsters, and moreover, with other cultural values such as traditional habitats that have followed to disappear, the scenario is eventually estimated that those ethnic minorities would not be listed on the national map as the consequence.

To conclude, as the aforementioned discussion, I disagree strongly with the opinion that the loss of language is not serious because the life could be easier. (305 words)

Essay on Using Translators

by Hahoang
(HCMC)

Nowadays it is possible to use computers and mobile phones for automatic language translation, and there is no need for human translators and interpreters.

Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

People have different views about the effective way of translating local language for the foreigner. While some people convinced that using mobile phones and computers to translate language automatically is a better way than renting translators. I totally disagree with this statement, as I strongly believe that human is an indispensable factor in this case and machines cannot understand all meaning of the text.

To begin with, translated machines have some limitations which can lead people misunderstanding the meaning of language. Firstly, the electronic translators have limited database, which just contained popular words of all languages and some phrases cannot be translated by these devices. For example, when foreigners use slang or idioms in speaking, people cannot understand without having experienced or an interpreter beside. In some cases, computer and mobile may be effective in translating the single word or short phrases, but it is not flexible with the long sentences. Translated programs tend to transform complicated sentences to word by word, so that reader cannot apprehend fully the meaning. Therefore, translated devices just found a good use among children to define the meaning of words.

Further emphasizing on my point of view, a human interpreter is much more useful than any computer or mobile devices. A translator may communicate with foreigner frequently without any trouble, for using mobile to translate, it is impossible if they do not have internet network. For example, when you enjoy a trip in a foreign country, interpreter helps you not only communicate with local citizens but also get you experience and knowledge about culture, manner, and custom… So that, a human translator is much more convenient than any electronic devices.

In conclusion, the advancement of technology is undeniable, however, the automatic program should use on searching vocabulary or short word. I believe that human translator sources are integral in the world and do not have any machines can replace them.

Death of Languages

by Murad
(Azerbaijan, Baku)

Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

These days, when you turn on the TV or flick through the pages of newspaper, you learn about the death of languages. Every year several languages die out due to the fact that people are trying to use the languages which are foremost and common. There are several inadequate languages and without them life will be easier, however, this is refuted by others. All arguments will be weighed prior to reaching an informed conclusion.

First of all, many people believe that death of languages is not essential, because there are lots of languages and the massive number of languages can entail some problems for the people. For example, people who are dealing with business and trying to make relations with foreigners should learn several languages. However, for this purpose, there are several languages which is common and all people try to learn them and use them for alleviating some communication difficulties. Also, common languages make education and life appropriate for foreigners. This examples show clearly that death of languages is not important due to the fact that people need common languages for easier life.

On the other hand, many people argue that all languages is vital for us. They believe that languages show our roots and they are symbols of our generations. For instance, people will not be eligible to learn about their history without languages. Furthermore, habitants always have a penchant for learning the traditions, customs and life style of their generations and without language it is impossible. It is easy to see why this argument has garnered a lot of support.

To sum up, it is believed that some languages are dying out and it is not vital, however others think that it is essential for learning about our roots.

Disappearing Minority Languages

by Thùy Lê Thị
(Vietnam)

In some countries, minority languages are disappearing. Some people say that governments should save languages. Others disagree.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Many minority languages which are spoken by small populations are on the verge of disappearance. Some people believe that the governments should pour the public budget into protecting their local languages, while the detractors tend to consider that it is unworthy. This essay will analyze each side of this controversial issue.

One of the main arguments for language-saving is that language is an invaluable part of culture. Definitely, speaking help people not only with communicating but also comprehending in order to enhance their community relations. In the term of humanity science and literature, writing is the most common and useful aiming at transmitting the knowledge and wisdom. That why, as a result, the present and following generations are able to access the substantial sources of documentaries in various types such as books, hand-writing papers, novels and researches... Another reason for saving minor population spoken languages is that they are the distinctive and characteristic features of every culture therefore they play an indispensable role in attracting tourists. Consequently, not only local authorities but also their citizen incomes are possibly enlarged considerably.

On the contrary, the opponents of spending state pensions on ethnic language protection claimed that it is unnecessary. Many people claim that governments ought to make every attempt to deal with the national issues for example economic recession, environment pollution or poverty... In addition, they believed that the globalization process will be more effective and beneficial with several superior common languages namely: English, French, Spanish and even Chinese and Japanese.

Taking everything into consideration, both sides of this debating have convincing arguments, however, in my point of view, although minority languages are spoken by the small number of local people, it is crucial and perennial profitable to preserve them from extinction. The responsibilities belong to not only the administrations but also the public and communities to save the language's lives.

Fewer Languages Essay

by sweta mishta
(Canada)

Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It has seen that various languages extinct every year. Some people reckon this is not relevant to have more styles of speaking because it can be a reason for making people life harder. They also believe that having fewer language in the world make their lives easier. However, in my opinion, language plays a vital role to showcase nations culture. I'm afraid I can't agree with this statement.

Firstly, the native languages are the eyes of the nation's culture. The ancient words depict the struggle and origin of such people who devoted their lives for standing up these languages, and if there local mean of communication dies, their battle will follow the death.
Another constraint would be, people from different countries may feel that they are ruled by a particular country, and that may develop the feeling of rage amongst the people of other reason.

Furthermore, people may feel various difficulties in learning a new language if they are grown up with their local language; it was seen that people feel incredibly confident if they are talking in their language. They can express their feeling more clearly and cohesively. If there are only a few languages, they may feel nostalgic and not able to correctly speak until they learn it in depth. However, people nowadays learning new foreign languages in searching for more ways of communicating people and better employment options but they have their own identity which depends on their way of speaking and the language they use.

Thus, having fewer styles will make one's life harder if one grown up with their local language and can not communicate wisely.

Approaches to Learning English Essay

by Rona
(Philippines)

Studying the English language in an English-speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language.

Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Since we were young, we learned different approaches on how to study. We have discovered what works and does not work for us. We dropped the method that was unhelpful and adapted the most effective way. It is because each person has different inner qualities and environments. For me, it is best to take advantage of whatever resources we have at hand. There is no one best way for everyone in the world.

At some point, I do agree that the environment aids our learning capabilities. The knowledge becomes more accessible and most likely, talking with other English-speaking citizens helps. We become more exposed to English words every day than when we were in a non-English-speaking country. One would get to hear how a certain word is used in a sentence. The person has access to a free simulation on how the language is utilized. The connotated meaning of terms in a certain context could be better known, including slang even. Good skill at comprehending would prevent miscommunications.

Also, living there would further motivate a person to study the language. Knowing the language is an essential part of living in a country. A better English skill in an English-speaking country would make one's life much easier. It would be most helpful in everyday life aspect, especially when one needs help. For example, help with place directions, and instructions.

On the other hand, I disagree that living in an English-speaking country to learn English is the best and only way to learn the language. As I have mentioned above, learning requires different approaches.

Almost everyone has access to the internet now. We have access to information in instant. We can utilize the internet in learning the language. Therefore, we do not need to move to an English-speaking country to be exposed to the language.

Actually, I can relate to this as I am currently learning a language. I use the internet and several phone language-learning applications, and I have realized their several uses. I can talk to a native speaker at any given time. We could be study buddies. It is a relationship with a give-and-take of information to improve language usage. Online, there are several language tests to gauge and enhance one's skill level, too. I had seen many free e-books, and video materials as well.

We have many options on how to approach studying. There is no one best method of learning English in the world. We find what fits us and make the best use of it.

• Writing
• Reading
• Speaking
• Listening

• All Lessons
• Vocabulary
• Quizzes
  
• Videos
• Forum
• Band Score Calculator
• Writing Feedback
• Speaking Feedback
• Teacher Resources
• Free Downloads
• Recent Essay Exam Questions
• Books for IELTS Prep
• Useful Links