Arts Essays

by Mepa

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.

To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Art is considered to be the main core of the country’s civilization and heritage. However, this type of science could attract people all over the world, so the governments have paid much more money on it rather than the significant daily services for the general population. In my point of view, government should cover all essential services financially then they could pay attentions to other entertained arts and theaters.

There are reasonable factors of why general services have taken the first priority by the government. First of all, Offering the best, high technological services for a normal citizen support him to work efficiently and rapidly. Secondly, once these governments seek to comfort their people by covering all their obvious requirements, the citizen would definitely aim to put his effort and behave to serve this country. Therefore, exchanging the benefits between the citizens and government is the significant advantage from the investing money on general services.

Some people have claimed that art and theater deserve much money more than general public services for two points. Although art field expresses as type of entertainment, a great deal of people extremely enjoys of being in front of the most popular singer, for instance Celindion, listen to her fascinated songs they love. Eventually, this might be for them one of the main necessity of their lives, especially in the leisure times.

Whatever was the need for the art and artists, I think the money should go for serving the human needs due to having better world and comfortable environments. I believe that singers and actors can work in places where the general people are fairly have served by governments. Hopefully, no more complaining about this issue anymore; otherwise crimes might be started in these countries.

***

Can any one correct my essay essay on arts and what my score will be if I wrote like this essay and what are my weak points?

Spending on Theatres and Museums or Medical Care and Education

by Jordan

Some people think that the government should not put money into building theatres and museums, but spend more money on medical care and education.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, the question of whether the government should allocate more money to the construction of theatres and museums or the development of medical care and education has become controversial. Some people suggest that the construction of theatres and museums needs to be given priority. However, I advocate putting more money into medical care and education. There are several reasons to support my view.

First, medical care and education are the basic needs of the general public. The opportunity of receiving medical care and education is indispensable to members of a modern society. Human beings get sick, so they need to receive medical care. Human beings need to learn in order to make a livelihood, so they need to be educated. Their needs of receiving medical care and education are thus related to the nature of human beings, which is an inflexible demand. In addition, satisfying people’s basic needs is an imperative for accountable governments. If a government cannot deliver fundamental medical care and education to the public, it will inevitably discredit its people whom it governs. As a result, the legitimacy of the government gradually declines, costing the whole society stability and solidarity.

However, the view of those who suggest putting more public funds into building more theatres and museums are understandable. They care more about the cultivation of people’s sense of art and culture. But I need to point out that these are not basic needs of people, lessening the necessity of such a suggestion.

In conclusion, the need of putting more public funds into medical care and education overwhelms that of allocating more public funds to the construction of theatres and museums.

(276 words)

***
To help this student improve their score or simply tell them what you think about the essay on spending on theatres and museums or medical care and education, you can post comments below.

Studying Art and Music in School

by melodi beyaz
(Turkey/İstanbul)

All students should be required to study art and music in secondary school.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

There is an argument that students should be required to study arts and music. I completely agree with this statement for two reasons. Arts and music helps students to be more creative and also it helps students to relax their busy schedule.

First of all, arts and music help people to be creative. In secondary school, student have more tendency to learn new things. If they receive arts and music education they will not only become more creative but also, possibly develop interest in this relevant area. Even, if they don't like arts and music, they will learn to evaluate problems from a different angle.

Secondly, nowadays all students are very busy and they need relaxation. Good music can help students to relax and forget about their problems. They always work hard for their lessons so they have to be relax in during school day It is true that maths, science and history are very important lessons but they can be too hard for them in a they therefore there needs to be arts and music.

In conclusion, every family wants their children become to be a doctor or an engineer but they never think about their abilities. Ideally, they need to start learning art and music in secondary school for finding their tendency.

***

What are your thoughts on this Essay on Studying Art and Music in Secondary School?

How can it be improved?

You can leave your comments below in order to help this student improve their IELTS score.

Government Investment in the Arts Essay

by Tom hank
(Georgetown, penang, malaysia)

Hi Guys,

I am attending the IELTS test in this coming September '15. Can anyone out there share me your comments of below drafted essay? Thanks in advance.

***

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.

To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Many people aware that arts have been existed since the ancient time. Even in today’s modern world, arts are still part of the important culture in the society in most of the countries. To discuss whether the government should divert their investment. I would like to share my opinions of this topic.

Firstly, I believe most of people agreed that the music and theatre have formed part of necessary entertainment in recent society. Especially we can see the cinemas are mushrooming in most of the shopping center within the cities. Bistro, pub and disco are also have become increasingly popular and is open everywhere. For instant, the government has taken one of street in the Kuala Lumpur city and convert to the entertainment hub which known as Bintang Walk. With this significant trend, it is an indication that most of the people have chosen to relax themselves physically and psychologically to release the working stress by enjoying the music and dancing. And even some of the businessmen use it as a meeting spot for business opportunities.

Whereas, the public services such as transportation, infrastructure, hospital and school are part of parcel of the responsibility as a government to develop especially the region has entered into the category of Developing Country. That is mean with or without discussing the investment in arts, it is a government mandatory investment in order to bring conveniences and benefits to the people who are living in the country. In addition, it also help to lift up the living standard and the country reputation as a whole.

In conclusion, I would opine that the government should financially support and encourage the private sectors to continue this significant trend in the city. The government should at the same time to promote the country traditional arts such as tribe’s music and dancing to the outside world as what most of the countries does.

Arts or Public Services

by lin
(china)

IELTS buddies please make a comment on my following essay that i chose the topic from model essays. my essay words is more than 300 and i want to reduce to around 280, but it is hard for me to change it. i follow the structure from buddy's ebook.

here is my essay below

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.

To what extent do you agree with this statement?

These days, governments spend a large part of the budget on public services and the arts. While I agree that it is important to provide funding to public services, I do not believe that money spent on the arts is a waste.

The obvious benefit of supporting public services is to ensure that general public would have a reasonable quality of life. For example, increasing funding on public hospitals would allow citizens to access necessary medical treatments without worrying about expensive medical costs and this in turn can provide citizens with a sense of security. Apart from the medical benefit, education is thought to be another advantage that bring by government support. Increase the money on education means that schools are able to expand teaching resources together with reducing school fees. As a result, families with financial disadvantage are more likely to afford school fees, which allow everyone to access education with equal opportunity.

Nevertheless, I believe that it is not a waste of money for governments to expand funding on the arts. To begin with, national museums and art galleries can serve as a dedicated area for visitors to take their first step towards learning. As these places usually organize interactive exhibits and special activities that encourage learning through play, it can tap on people’s creativity. In addition, citizens can experience the entire transformation of their countries and cities, as pictures and video resources are kept in museums. Take city of Shanghai as an example, local residents feel proud of their city’s rapid developments and remarkable achievements through watching documentary film, as they realize that their city used to be just a small fish village. There is no doubt that art galleries and museums have changed people’s perception in many ways and this would not have been possible without government funding.

In conclusion, it seems to me that government funding on the arts and public services are both necessary.

Investing in the Arts or Public Services

by Helen Nguyen
(Cassino, Frosinone, Italy)

Hi everyone,

I'm very happy that I found this forum of Ielts buddy. I'm practicing for Ielts writing especially task 2. However, I did get a lot of troubles when I'm self-study because there is no one helping me to evaluate and correct my work. I really hope that I can post my essay here and have someone read and corrected it for me. I very appreciate the help from you guys and I'm welcome all your comments. This is the latest topic that I have written.

***
Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.

To what extent do you agree with this statement?

In the recent years, some artistic sectors such as musics, theaters have received a significant amount of financial support from the government. Although many people assert that the governmental budget should place more on other public sectors, it is believed that the fields of art are also necessarily to be invested.

Firstly, since the demand in fundamental pubis sectors is extremely crucial, the investment from the government is out of question. These services could be hospitals, schools, road systems which are critically essential to the needs of society. For instance, if the governmental institution did not spend more money on medical research to find new treatments for different diseases, people would not avoid the risk of facing with the early death. In addition, the more developed one country is, the more money spent advancing infrastructure of these sectors is required to enhance living standard.

In contrast, the area of art should not be neglected because of these following reasons. First and foremost, some research has shown that the emotional life and mental health of a person increasingly become more important. It is undeniable that musics, movies, and many other artistic areas are efficient tools of entertaining and relieving people from pain. Furthermore, there exists a growing tendency of creative and aesthetic people who are very passionate about arts; however, some established unions and private organizations are not wealthy enough to support them. Therefore, these people truly need a huge investment from governmental side to meet the increase demand of a spirited and pleasurable community.

To conclude, even though I do support that such primary public sectors should be invested seriously, I do not agree with the inattention to the fields of art because they keep balancing the welfare of the society.

Funding for Musicians, Painters and Poets

by dev
(Philippines)

Should the government continue to fund various kinds of arts like musicians, painters and poets or not anymore?

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people are of the view that the government should support artist such as, musicians, painters and poets through funding, but others disagree with this view. I strongly agree with the former argument because of several reasons.

For those who believe that officials should no longer contribute any money as a means of support, it can be said that the leaders must focus deeply on major problems in the country, rather than focusing on the improvement in arts and entertainment. For instance, in my country Philippines, it is not practical and necessary for the government to allocate funds for artists because poverty is widely seen around the community. Thus, the priority in providing food, clothing and shelter for the marginalized group is the best option in spending funds.

On the other hand, I believe that artists should be supported financially by the government because it is one way where the country can gain profit through the tourism industry. It is undeniably true that, artists have a great contribution in promoting national history and culture through their unique and creative works. Without improvement in this area, it is most likely that less people will become interested in exploring different talents of the locals and thus, individuals from other nation having a tour would not understand clearly the country's antiquity.

In my experience, traveling in different places makes it more meaningful and exciting when I have come to learn the history and a chance to interact with other individual having different beliefs and I believe, this can be achieved through arts and entertainment.

The conclusion of the matter is that, artists need support from the government to grow and to help attract more foreigners to visit the place and as a result, the community can save money which can be used for the improvement of the country as a whole.

____________________________________________________

Please provide feedback on my essay about governments continuing to fund various kinds of arts like musicians, painters and poets

Tax Payer's Money Spent on the Arts

by Zeki
(İstanbul)

In many countries, government sponsorship of the arts costs millions in taxpayers money. There are many more important things to spend Money on.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people want to buy original art, hence they peaces can be enormously expensive. Also, governments support this trade because the government will take tax from each trade, but there are many essential things to spend money.

Nowadays, some well-known people are buying a picture made by DA Vinci and they are paying lots of money. For example, recently, someone took the picture and paid about 10 million dollars. As we known, governments will take %15 tax for this trade from the trader. This price is more expensive than many things. This case must be controlled and under the control of governments. For example, that half of money could save many lives or could build a school for poor children.

Also, government, earning money from this trade, under called name is taxable. Governments are supporting because they need money and they need the tax. For this reason government can be sponsorship of the arts trade. Many people are expecting service from the governments and they know need money for service, but that enormous amount of money can be spent more beneficial organizations.

To sum up, I have never supported this case and I think, this must be under the control of government. Maybe create a fund and transport the specific percent of trade amount to fund and maybe that money can use for beneficial, for example build a school or help to the Africa's children.

***

Help this student to improve their score by commenting below on the essay on Tax Payer's Money Spent on the Arts.

Foreign Films versus Locally Produced Films

by Fahad

Please Evaluate and point out error and mistakes.

Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films.

Why could this be?

Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?

Film industry flourished dramatically over the last few years. Technological advancements have made a big contribution in the success of this industry. Countries such as India, USA etc. are highly dependent on this industry. Their governments are financially supporting to achieve better and long lasting result. They are in the process of sticking people to watch their own locally produced movies.

There are several reasons of shift in term of watching movies. Nowadays, people are smarter; they do not want to waste their time and money for an ordinary movie. They want quality movie, which has big cast, good camera work, full of emotions and suspense. In addition to this, they want something new and unique. This is why they are pursuing towards foreign films.

Lack of funds is one of the vital reason in competing other movie industries. People are reluctant to work in local films because they have been paid very less. These people try to find their career in other countries because of high income and appreciation. Government should support their local film industry in order to equip with latest technology such as cameras, software and trainings. The good work of celebrities should be acknowledge and awarded by the government, this will encourage good people to join and serve for this industry.

In conclusion, I would to say that with mutual support of government and people, will definitely help local film industry to grow immensely. This will later turn as fruitful tree for our economy.

Essay Spending Money on the Arts

by sacmanitin

Please evaluate my Task 2 writing :

Also if you can indicate what band this can achieve.

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.

To what extend do you agree with this view?

Each country’s government has one of the most important responsibility to use its resources in such a way that it address the most essential needs of the country. Looking into this context, for developing nations, where food, clothing and shelter related requirements are yet not addressed fully, how logical it is to spend money on art and art related causes, when these funds can be utilized for addressing other essential needs of country and its people. Although routing the money to other different cause, which look more primary in nature, look like the right choice, promoting and nurturing art provide equally important benefits to a state if not higher. In this essay, we will discuss how art is a must area to take care of .

First of all, when the government support art institutions through subsidy and grants, it support the entire fraternity whose livelihood depends on the well-being of art. Thus, it help in providing sufficient life support to artist and people who are connected to arts for livelihood. In this way, such government support help thrive the art segment.

Secondly, art not only provide just a medium for earning, it also bring the creative side of individuals. These skills are very important for out-of-box thinking. This is evident when you consider the fact that many organizations and universities give special preference to artists as they know it is a rare breed to cultivate synthetically.

At the end, art for any country, is known to be deeply connected to its culture and value system. In the present era of globalization, which also bring the ill effect of weakening ties to our roots, art keep these connection alive and strengthen the character of a person.

Will this essay get me a band 7?

please can any experienced teacher tell me if i can achieve 7 in such type of writing for task 2 in general training model:

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

While many people would argue that education and infrastructure should be at the top priorities of a government, I believe that spending on arts too is essential. A country with no interest in arts lacks the foundations of an enlightened nation. Another important observation is that arts pay back in many ways especially through tourism, and that money can be spent on improving the lives of the very people complaining about it.

Spending money on the arts would lead to tremendous benefits to a nation mainly in the area of cultural identity and tourism revenues. Building or preserving an art gallery would encourage tourists to visit that place and know more about the culture as well as the history of the town or city they are visiting. Art pieces displayed in galleries are not just appealing to the eye, but also serve as an effective branding tool that sets the identity of the country in the minds of tourists. A good example in this area, is the internationally renowned museums such as the Louvers in France and the Acropolis in Greece which people fly from all over the world to visit.

On the other hand, I cannot but understand why proponents of this “wasted investment” as they consider it, hold such outlooks. These people look into situations from the perspective of priorities. To them, there are factors that are more essential in life and that governments have to look at. Examples of these factors include hospitals, schooling, infrastructure and security. It is irrefutable, thus, that these factors are crucial and no one can forgo that. Here comes, however, the role of the government to ensure equal allocation of available resources to accomplish social justice and welfare.

In a nut shell, I don’t agree with this saying and I strongly believe that arts define the identity of the country and boosts tourism. There is nothing wrong with governments supporting arts as long as they are investing revenues in improving their countries in general and the social wellbeing in particular.

Spending Money on the Arts Essay

by GAURI KALRA
(GURGAON, HARYANA, INDIA)

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.

To what extent do you agree with this view?

While there are people who believe that the government has been venturing most of the monetary funds in developing arts in the country and such act may not prove to be beneficial. Moreover, they think that instead of squandering excess of money on arts and literature, this could be utilized in better ways. In my opinion, I agree that Government should invest money in community services first rather in arts. However, I believe improving arts may also add to a country’s economy and restoring heritage.

Primarily, a government functions for the welfare of the citizens of the country. In the view of this, for development of a country, effective strategies must be formulated in the benefit of the countrymen. It is advisable that government should spend on services centering the society’s welfare. Government should use the national funds in improving civic amenities such as building schools, advanced and fully equipped hospitals, community centres and parks. In doing so, the citizen of the country feels proud of their governance and return back with paying taxes further strengthening the economy.

However, completely neglecting art and literature may not be desirable. Since, developing arts in the form of music, theatre and artistic infrastructure may invite tourism internationally as well as nationally. Large scale music concerts and plays may attract millions of art lovers from different corners of the world. Moreover, construction of art specific museums and exhibition centres can impress the crowd. This may further boost a country’s economy and allows amalgamation of varied cultures.

To conclude, I would agree that taking care of the basic needs of the society and working primarily for their welfare is the need of the hour. However, developing fields like arts may also be essential for strengthening the economy.

site search by freefind	advanced

• Writing
• Reading
• Speaking
• Listening

• All Lessons
• Vocabulary
• Quizzes
  
• Videos
• Forum
• Band Score Calculator
• Writing Feedback
• Speaking Feedback
• Teacher Resources
• Free Downloads
• Recent Essay Exam Questions
• Books for IELTS Prep
• Useful Links