Environmental Problems Essays

by preet

Water Scarcity

Water resources around the world are getting scarce.

Discuss the causes and solutions.


Fresh water has a fundamentally beneficial influence on our lives as one cannot imagine life on the Earth without water. Water plays an indispensable role in our daily life as the large proportion of water is used for industrial and farming sectors. Additionally, water resources are drastically decreasing due to unawareness of people as they presume that water is renewable. Both the causes and solutions will be scrutinized in this essay in greater details.

Initially, deforestation and conventional way of farming are the rudimentary causes of water scarcity. Despite the fact that the increase in world's population acts as a precursor towards diminishing water resources. To illustrate this fact, immense amount of forest are cleared to utilize that land for cultivation and grow more crops to satisfy demand of growing population in current era.

There are several action that an individual or society could take to solve aforementioned problem. Firstly, governments should spread awareness through media such as television and radio about the significance of tress in our lives and encourage citizens to grow more and more tress. Secondly, farmers should adopt new technology such as hybrid seeds to improve the output of crops and also use recycle water for irrigation. Finally, rain water should be stored and used for harvesting and can also for domestic use to mitigate the water waste.

To recapitulate, all the above mentioned it can be stated that awareness in people and advanced technology can only resolve water scarcity dilemma. Admittedly, people need to think wisely and act efficiently to preserve water.

***
You can provide feedback for this Environmental Problems Essay below. Comments can help this student improve their IELTS score.

Noise Pollution

by Ehsangh

Some people think that they can make as much noise as they want, while others think that the amount of noise people make should be strictly controlled.

Discuss both views and include your own opinion and examples.

It is unfortunately the case that in any society we can find a number of people who do not respect to the social rights of others. One of the most disturbing cases is making noise either in public or people's private life. While the majority of people believe that the amount of noise produced by individuals must be restricted, there are still people who think that they have freedom to make noise regardless of considering other's life. In this essay, I will explain my point of view by examining both sides of the argument.

Some people think that they should not take any responsibility related to limiting or decreasing the noise made by them. They claim that controlling the amount of the noise by rules and regulations not only invades their personal privacy, but it violates their social freedom. For example, in their view, listening to music loudly or hosting night parties in their own apartments would be considered as their basic human rights of being happy.

There is, however, a strong argument that it is the responsibility of all members of a society to respect others' social life. Most people object to disrupting other's life by making unlimited noises. They believe that making noise should be controlled as much as possible when it creates disturbance for others by regulating strict rules. A common example here is to prohibit talking over cell phones loudly in the public such as in a subway which is clearly creating disturbance for people who are near the person while it has been frequently happening.

In my view, any type of activity that creates disturbance for citizens' life must be controlled, and noise is no exception. Although it is beyond the power of governments to control all disturbing noises in the whole society, it seems to be possible that making some avoidable noises is banned in certain places such as near hospitals.

_______________________________________

Please give me feedback for my Environmental Problems Essay on noise pollution.

Managing Global Environmental Damage

by long
(hong kong)

Please give me some comment on my environmental problems essay, especially on grammatical mistakes, thank you

Should global environmental damage be managed by the government or individuals?


with the rapid development of modern world, global environment hazards are brought to our attention, some people suggest that the government should play a more important role on reducing the environmental damage, while others believe that the individual efforts cannot be ignored.

to begin with, one of the major environmental hazards is the uncontrolled greenhouse gases emission by burning fossil fuel. in order to tackle the problem, the government plays a vital role. for example, the united nations have reached the agreement on annual carbon emission even china has promised to reduced the emission to international standard. it is obvious that the government has the power to alter others attitude towards environmental issue, which can be use to minimise carbon emission.

on top of this, government can effectively prevent deforestation by reinforcing law and employing heavy punishment to offenders. in some rural countries, where people rely on logging business, the industry cut down trees incautiously and leads to serious rainforest destruction. if strict regulations are applied by the authority, the natural environment can be preserved.

however, individual can also make a great deal of effort on reducing impact by altering their lifestyle. the air quality would be greatly improved if people are willing to use public transport instead of private cars. landfill will be prolonged if people abandon the use of plastic as packaging materials and seek eco friendly alternatives. if people have the conception of recycling, the amount of pollutants produced will be significantly reduced.

on a whole, the government plays a crucial role on this worldwide issue. however, the individual influence cannot be underestimated.

Paying to Clean Up the Environment

by han4

Many people believe that companies and individuals should pay to clean up the environment in proportion to the amount of pollution they have produced.

Do you agree or disagree?

Over the past decades of ecological history, various environmental problems that the world faced; some may due to natural catastrophe, but most of them are caused by human activities. As a result, many countries have to bear with pointless expenditure to rejuvenate the state of their environment. Some people argued that every individual inclusive company is obliged to pay the cleaning cost of their actions that lead to environmental degradation, while others believed that certain actions are just unavoidable. This essay will present both sides of arguments before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.


To begin with, Go Green defenders claimed that everyone should be penalized for their doings that caused environmental problems. Although this may be true to certain extent, however, some of the contamination results from human actions are just inevitable. In the modern era, many daily activities require energy to operate. Most of the energy that human used such as fuel and coals, contain with combustible materials, which will contribute to the environment pollution. Despite the existence of renewable and clean energy, this technology is still expensive at the moment and not every individual can afford to have. Hence, putting these costs and blames on these low level incomes groups will definitely burden them.

However, certain activities that harmed the environment are primarily motivated for self-interest. This can be easily evident from irresponsible companies that earned large profits from their noncompliance’s activities such as over logging. Another great example is where household family discarded unwanted objects or food recklessly just to avoid paying disposal or cleaning fee. All these self-centeredness actions have caused serious global warming. Thus, by imposing penalty on these selfish deeds, government can utilize this fund to restore and improve the ecosystem.

To sum up, there are clear supporting reasons for both sides of views; however, in my opinion, it is still believed that preserving the ecosystem is a responsibility of every person. Hence, any egotistical actions that resulted to environmental damage, they should be liable for the cost of rehabilitation flora and fauna.

***

You can feedback below on this student's environmental problems essay on who should pay to clean up the environment.

An Essay on damaging the environment

by Arvind Sharma
(India)

Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment.

What can government do to address these problems?

What can individual people do?

Over many decades, human beings have been damaging the ecosystem, but it has always been criticized the ways in which they are damaging the environment. It is essential to understand these different methods which are responsible in polluting the environment. In this essay, all possible ways of damaging the environment will be examined before pointing out the roles of government and an individual in this pressing matter.

To begin with the numerous means which cause the ecosystem polluted and destructive. Firstly, the deforestation where humans continually cutting down the trees for making the room for the living or constructing the new houses. As a result, many countries are being affected by flood and other natural disasters. Secondly, in order to fulfil the needs of the people, factories and mills are emitting the carbon which causes the ozone layer is being damaged. Consequently, the harmful rays are impacting adverse to the people’s health. Finally, the wastage, which is being collected by the people, is being poured into the soil which makes the land infertile. After examining the different ways, it has been clear that humans are responsible for making the environment worse.

Next, the question is that what the government should do for addressing these acute problems. The government can play a pivotal role in order to highlight the issues of global warming. In other words, people can get familiar with the negative effects of global warming by organizing the government funded awareness camps. Moreover, media can play an important role by having the collaboration with government to address the pressing issues of damaging environment on television. On the other hand, people can control their habits which cause the environment polluted. For instance, by avoiding the usage of plastic bags they can save the environment from pollution to some extent. In addition to this, they can control their desires which cause the factories and mills to produce more to fulfill their demands. Therefore, undoubtedly, if both government and an individual understand their responsibilities towards the environment, it can be saved from the destruction.

In conclusion, after analyzing the different ways of damaging the environment, and the significant roles of the government and an individual. I opine that this problem cannot be solved to think in isolation, therefore, it is important to both government and individual should come forward and take a responsibility to alleviate this extreme problem otherwise they have to live with the consequences of it.

***
Please can you check my essay on damaging the environment.

Damaging of the Environment

by Prasa
(Sri Lanka)

Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment.

What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?

The global environment is deteriorating at accelerated phase due to human activities where states and individuals have a major role to play together to prevent this and preserve the environment.

At the outset, human activities such as deforestation for housing and factories shrink the green cover of the world which further impacted by the emission of greenhouse and toxic gases with the use of fossil fuel in vehicles and factories. Moreover, the excessive use of non-degradable plastics damages the soil vegetation and impact marine life. Though these are essential for the day to day life, the irresponsible behaviors of humans has done irreparable damage to the Mother Nature.

On the other hand, governments around the world are in the confusing battle of prioritizing the environment protection over the creation of better life for their citizens. The focus should be directed to preserving the forest cover with clear demarcation and strict regulation on emission levels. Furthermore, state should encourage the scientific research on alternatives for plastic with bio-degradable materials which are similar in terms of convenience and alternative sources of sustainable energy in place of fossil fuel.

However the general public cannot wash their hands off from this global issue where they also have to realize the social role in preservation of environment. This should include from preventing littering, reducing the use of plastics or reuse them to reduce the damage to use of alternative modes of transport then excessive use of fuel driven private cars.

Furthermore, this can be improved by creating a demand for organically grown food instead of consuming produce of modern farming techniques which use chemical fertilizer that disturbs the lives inside the soil and water ways near the farms.

In a nutshell, the prevention of environmental pollution is not only a responsibility of governments though they are the predominant party to plan macroeconomic policy for solutions but also a responsibility of individuals to adopt environmental friendly lifestyle.

Improving the Environment Essay

by Su jin
(Seoul )

Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and large companies can make a difference.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this modern era where technology and industrialization has highly developed, keeping the environment safe and clean has become a big concern for human kind. Some people say that governments and large companies should play a big role to protect the nature and take appropriate measures to solve the problems. In my opinion individuals can also contribute to the nature protection on their own level.

First of all, one of the main issues that we encounter today is air pollution and the smoke of factories and cars is the main cause of it. Thus in order to reduce the air pollution people should use public transport instead of private cars to commute to the work. In this way the number of cars will be decreased and so will be the harmful smoke that they emit to the air.

Secondly, the second biggest problem is the garbage. We can reduce garbage by recycling the materials and reuse it. Thus people should sort out the garbage and throw them away properly. Some wastes such as bottles and plastic papers take centuries to get absorbed into the soil and harm the animal habitat for a long time. Therefore, recycling the bottles, cans and using paper bags instead of plastic ones could be the answer to it.

At last, some of our earth's energy resources such as electricity, food supply, water are non-renewable. Thus it would be better if we consider consuming energy supplies properly by turning off the light and other electronic devices when not using them and saving water by closing tap after use.

In conclusion, however, protecting the environment is a big topic it is not that far from our lives. In other words individuals surely can help to improve the condition by doing minor habitual things including using a public transport, recycling, saving energy and so on. Our future is in our hands. If we do not start implementing and influencing others in protecting our mother nature then who would be in responsible of it.

Natural Disasters Essay

by Pradeep
(Hyderabad,India)

Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters.

To what extent do you agree or disagree.
 
There is no doubt that extending help to someone during tough times is paramount. Rich countries should support poverty-stricken nations with altruistic aid while calamities take place. I completely agree with the statement and convey my views concerned to it in the following essay.
 
Affluent countries are stocked with essential resources like money, medicine, groceries, and equipment. For example, the USA has got reserves of such resources for the next 100 years. Being rich, similar nations are in a position to support countries that suffer economically and emotionally during nature havoc. The result of this is, not only induces good relations between countries but also paves the way to commercial transactions with minimized taxes in the future, as similar happened in the case of Vietnam and Japan.
 
The help of advanced technologies from higher nations results in rescuing and retention of casualties’ precious lives. The help-seeking countries certainly have lack sophisticated technologies to forecast, mitigate natural calamities. For example, life detecting flights were brought from other nations and deployed to identify soldiers with active heartbeats but struggling to survive during the Kargil war. As a result, quite a several soldiers survived and good relations, trust were established between nations. In return, it resulted in 1 billion dollars worth of armory purchase transactions.
 
To sum up, as per a saying ‘a friend in need is a friend indeed ‘, wealthy nations must support deprived countries. Being taken the opportunity, rich countries contribute to creating a feeling of comfort and security in devastated help-seeking nations. This also inculcates a sense of be-ready-to-help kind of trait in poorer nations within their range.

Mandating Recycling Essay

by Beryl
(Turkey)

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

In contemporary society there is a ongoing discussion whether sufficient waste from homes is recycled to increase longevity of sources and thus, livebility of environment. Some group of people also claim that governments should be obliged to take action on that issue via providing laws regarding that issue.

Although, governments’ providing a legal requirement might be beneficial to some extent, it might not be fully effective. For instance, some group of people might perceive this law as only made to please environmentalists. Due to that reason some people might exclude themselves from responsibilities law enforced to them. Moreover, some group of people only take into account their personal gains. Therefore, may not be interested with providing a good environmental heritage to upcoming future generations. When all these mentioned diverse perspectives taken into account utilizing positive reinforcement might be more beneficial for increasing the amount recycled waste. For instance, in Germany the amount of recycling is high because citizens are given a very low cash prize like 1 euro in return to the every plastic bottle they recycled. Therefore, while enforcing laws on people the characteristics of society and the impact of these society on people should taken into account while creating a legislation for the citizens. However, the crucial point for making people recycle is not limited with impact of laws, it starts with increasing citizens and companies conscious about the topic. To exemplify, for decreasing plastic waste some companies are making their own precautions and using their own initiatives such as Starbucks or other little coffeeshops. Starbucks’ initiative about making people recycle more is turning to use paper straws rather than plastic straws.This is because paper is an easily decomposable product compared to plastics thus, it can easily be recycled.Another initiative of Starbucks’ is providing a 15% discount to people who bring their own termos so, both companies’ and that individuals’ waste amount is decreased to an extent.Furthermore, some local coffee shops are giving their products in reusable bottles while explaining the importance of continuability .As a result, they are also supporting development of conscious level of people in that topic. Consequently, people might behave more conscious in the issue of recycling.

To conclude, we can accept that laws are limited in the extent of making people recycle fully. Therefore, we can use environmental enforces like using places to provide people with knowledge about the subject such as coffee shops. Furthermore, the impact of laws is effective on the extent people followed and applied them. If only these laws regarding recycling was formed in a society where laws are followed and applied we can say that a legislation aiming increase recycle can be successful -in 100%-fully-.

site search by freefind	advanced

• Writing
• Reading
• Speaking
• Listening

• All Lessons
• Vocabulary
• Quizzes
  
• Videos
• Forum
• Band Score Calculator
• Writing Feedback
• Speaking Feedback
• Teacher Resources
• Free Downloads
• Recent Essay Exam Questions
• Books for IELTS Prep
• Useful Links